data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f25c3/f25c3fd0e9cb0b38873881f5c680a48d2088019a" alt="" |
The Smartest Guys At ESPN |
March is the time of year we start to see the snow melt, we
drink green alcohol and the word bracket as well as the terms “Bracketology”
and “Bracket busters” start appearing in Pizza commercials, local news
broadcasts and out of the mouth of that guy at work who once a year talks to you about sports. March Madness indeed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/640b0/640b0c0a4e210b0ee71dfdf009c4fccf01ab9ce1" alt="" |
PHD In Bracketology |
Do a bracket or don’t.
Watch the tournament or don’t.
But could we please dispense of the cliché’s? Could people who don’t care about sports
please not talk about this? And for the
love of all things holy, could ESPN stop.
I get that people look forward to this and filling out a bracket and
watching it crumble gives a person a connection they otherwise wouldn’t have
adding to the interest in the actual tournament. That’s all fine. But we need to mandate some cultural change
to this time of year and this tournament.
The talking heads on local and national news need to drop
the personal anecdotes. I doubt your 4
year old daughter did better with her picks than most like you claim every
year. I doubt a 4 year old could fill out a complete bracket correctly by them self. And
even if she did that’s really just a story about you having a kid and trust
me. No one fucking cares that Dave Dahl
has a kid. What’s your point anyway? That even someone as stupid as your kid has a
chance? And if you do work for the news
but don’t cover sports, don’t talk about the tournament on air unless it ties
into an actual story you would cover.
That story can’t be about how much time is lost in the work
space every year because of the tournament.
If you don’t think that has been covered you are fucking retarded.
The term Bracketology and Bracketologist can only be used in
jest or satirically. In other words
ESPN, you cannot interview someone you are crediting as a bracketologist. It’s not a thing. Where did he get his degree? It’s fine if Pizza Hut wants to make it part
of some sort of two topping large pizza promotion, but you, ESPN, are supposed
to actually cover this event. You sound
like a moron when you refer to a grown man as a bracketologist.
Currently there are 68 teams in the tournament. Which is plenty. Stop talking about who got snubbed. No one got snubbed. There are no snubs. At best there are 20 good teams. Trust me.
They all got in. If your team didn’t
make it then your team isn’t any good. And
if you made it 70 teams, there would still be just as many teams claiming they
were snubbed. There would still be just
as much air time dedicated to who got snubbed.
Just drop it.
The reporting and coverage of this event should be
better. Not more. Better.
Lazy reporting should result in people getting less opportunity. Less air time. Losing their jobs. If your job is to regurgitate cliché’s, then
you aren’t very good at your job. If you
don’t have something unique to say, it doesn’t need to be said. And if you read a teleprompter for a living
understand this. YOU ARE NOT THE
STORY. That pretty much applies to
everything you cover. We don’t care that
you have a kid, a husband, a wife or a dog.
Your personal anecdotes do not add to the story they distract from
it. And considering how unimportant the
NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament is, it shouldn’t be that hard to stick your stupid,
made up story about how your Yorkie picked the best bracket in your pool, up
your ass.
Go Duke!
HATE MAIL