Whether it was Bruce Kulick on the Arsenio Hall show in 1994
snarking that he’s been in the band longer than Ace and he’s still the new guy
or more recently when Paul used the fact that the current lineup has been
together almost as long as the original 4 members of KISS were as an excuse not
to perform with Ace and Peter at the ROR HOF induction ceremony. It has,
from time to time, been said that KISS without Ace and Peter has been more
relevant. Typically using calendar years as evidence of
significance.
Let me state for the record that I find this to be a
minority opinion and typically voiced by Gene or Paul. I don’t feel that
way for sure. But it is not a fringe opinion. As someone who
considers himself to be an expert in all things KISS I can tell you that there
has always been a segment of the fan base that fully supports whatever the
current lineup is and any decisions it makes and products it releases. To
the extreme they feel the need to defend it. I think they should’ve
stopped after the reunion tour. That’s my opinion. There are fans
of KISS that upon reading that sentence have already decided I hate the current
band. Which not only isn’t true it isn’t what I said. What can you
do?
I’ll tell you what you can do. Take opinion out of the
equation. KISS as it is started performing in 2003. On paper that’s
just over 10 years. The original band started in 1973 and Peter was
officially out of the band in 1980 which is barely 7 years. Sure they
reunited for 5 years from 1996-2001 but they never did 10 years
straight. Plus there’s no reason to think this lineup won’t keep going at
least 2 more years. Toss in Eric’s years with the band before the reunion
and it’s pretty clear. The current lineup is more legit, more important
and by default the more significant.
But shouldn't the question be what did any lineup do with their time? How productive were
they? What did Bruce Kulick really contribute to the legacy of KISS? How important was the addition of Eric Singer
in 1992? And how does the current lineup
truly stack up to previous lineups. From
2003 to now, the current lineup has released a whopping 2 studio albums of new
material. The original four released their first two records in 8
months. In the last decade both Gene and Paul have released solo albums
and written books. They started their own restaurant
chain and purchased an arena league football team. Paul did a solo tour and released a DVD all
while he pursued his art career as a painter. Gene had a reality TV
series, started an advertising agency and Eric Singer found time to do a few
tours with Alice Cooper as well as with his own project ESP. By way of
comparison Ace Frehley got shit for skipping out on a recording session to play
cards with some friends.
The point is simple. 10 days of inactivity in KISS are
not equal to 1 day of productivity. Time alone is an inaccurate and
misleading way to measure significance. In this instance anyway. So
I came up with a point system to determine what version of the band delivered
the biggest bang for the buck. I call it… BLOKE (or Bakko’s Law Of KISS
Equation.) It works like this.
Years in the band – 2 pts. Per year
Studio Albums – 5 pts. Per album
Live Albums – 3 pts. Per album
Shows Played – 10 Shows = 1 pt.
Album Sales – 100K = 1 pt.
Years with no tour/no album – 1 year = -20 pts.
And probably the most revealing statistic.
Songs in the current setlist – 1 pt for every year since
release (ex. Deuce = 40 pts. Hell or Halleluah = 2 pts)
As you see I not only give points to things like “years of
service” and “shows played” but I felt it necessary to take points away for
years of inactivity. You can't give 1976 the same score as 2006. 3 tours and 2 albums vs. none of either. My criteria for
“inactivity” is the absence of a proper tour or record release. A proper tour is considered a minimum of 25
dates in no more than 60 days. I also felt the songs that are currently in the set list should be weighted giving points for longevity. And I
gave no points for the barrage of repackaging of previous material in the form
of all the greatest hits, live etc albums that came out the last decade. Also with the Ace and Peter in/out of the
band in 2002-2003 I gave neither credit for those years. For the sake of this equation 2003 is the
start of the current lineup. I also
figured the powers that be chose to present Unmasked as an album with Peter
Criss so I gave him credit for that. I
used the same reasoning for Ace on Creatures.
I did not overlap any members. I
used my best judgment when doing so and I didn’t award any points for the 78
solo albums, Best of Solo or Killers.
The Original lineup of Gene, Paul, Peter and Ace came in the
highest with a BLOKE score of almost 734 while the current lineup of Gene,
Paul, Eric Singer and Tommy came in last with a BLOKE score of 11 pts. Even if you were to remove the penalty for
years of inactivity they would still come in a distant third to the lineup of
Gene, Paul, Eric Carr and Bruce Kulick which was officially together 7 years
and just slightly ahead of the much maligned and short lived lineup of Gene,
Paul, Eric Carr and Vinnie Vincent.
Which lasted barely a year, which I’ve been told is much less than the
10+ that Paul tells us the current band has been together.
What does this really tell us. Quite simply, that KISS was far busier in the
first 7 years than the last 10. And
there are reasons for that. When you’re
young and hungry you have the time, drive and energy to do more. Your working toward a goal. It also tells us that this was when much of the
music they still play was written and recorded.
Whereas the current
lineup took a break from late 2004 until mid 2008. Gene and Paul spent time working on many other
things leaving Tommy to focus on the bands legacy which I would say he did
brilliantly with the KISSOLOGY releases.
But the only time they came close to achieving the success and dominance
of the band from 1976-1979 was when they reunited in 1996. I have only one point. It’s ridiculous to say or imply that the
current lineup or any lineup that doesn’t include Ace Frehley and Peter Criss
has ever approached the same level of significance. You may prefer the Crazy Nights band but
without the original band, that band doesn’t exist.
Also, you can’t compare Ace and Peter to Tommy and
Eric. Or Bruce, Mark, Vinnie and Eric
Carr. Being a founding member of a band
that achieved the heights that KISS did is nothing like being a contracted
employee of that band after the fame has been achieved. Unless your name is Vinnie Vincent, you’re
not going to have the same level of entitlement as a hired musician as you
would as a founding member. You will not
have the personal or emotional connection.
We’ll never know how Bruce Kulick would’ve dealt with the Gene and Paul
power play that started to take place towards the end of the original bands
run, or how Eric Singer would feel seeing another person wearing the makeup he
created playing his part in the band, or how Tommy would’ve approached the
Elder sessions or even how Ace would handle being in the role Tommy is in right
now.
KISS has for many reasons endured into their 5th
decade. That would never happen without
Paul Stanley. If you want to talk real significance it's Paul. They may have had their ups
and downs but without him there would be no need to discuss which lineup did
what. Gene is largely the most famous
face in KISS and if you’ve listened to Paul the last decade its clear he has
grown tired of the Demon garnering the lion’s share of attention for the work
he put in. Not that Gene hasn’t been a
large part of the bands success. It’s
just that starting in 78’ he has checked out from time to time. So take a bow Paul. YOU more than anyone you’ve shared a stage
with has earned it. You also earned the
right to play with who want and call it KISS.
But at some point you should realize you won. Minimizing any of the lineups contribution
doesn’t make the current one seem better.
It just makes you sound bitter.
Gene spews so much bullshit out of his mouth I figure most people can’t
tell the difference between him and Ted Nugent.
As for the BLOKE scores, actual tallies are below. Bring on the hate mail and math corrections.
Original Lineup
Paul, Gene, Ace and Peter
1973 – 1980; 1996-2001 = 12 pts
Studio albums – 9 = 45 pts
Live Albums – 3 = 9 pts
Shows Played – 1018 = 101.8
Records Sold* – 17 million. = 170 pts
Years with no tour/no album – 0 = 0 pts
Songs in current playlist – 11 (396 total years) = 396 pts
Total Points – 733.8
Lineup 2
Paul, Gene, Ace and Eric Carr
1980-1982 = 2 pts
Studio Albums – 2 = 10 pts
Live albums – 0
Shows Played – 42 = 4.2 pts
Records Sold – 1 Million = 10 pts
Years with no tour/no album – 0 = 0 pts
Songs in current playlist – 2 (22 years) = 22 pts
Total Points – 48.2
Lineup 3
Paul, Gene, Eric Carr and Vinnie Vincent
1982-1983 = 1 pt
Studio albums – 1 = 5 pts
Live Albums – 0 = 0 pts
Shows Played – 150 = 15
Records Sold – 1.2 million. = 12 pts
Years with no tour/no album – 0 = 0 pts
Songs in current playlist – 1 (21 total years) = 21 pts
Total Points – 54
Lineup 4
Paul, Gene, Eric Carr and Mark St. John
1984 = 1 pt
Studio albums – 1 = 5 pts
Live Albums – 0 = 0 pts
Shows Played – 2? = 0 pts
Records Sold – 1.2 million. = 12 pts
Years with no tour/no album – 0 = 0 pts
Songs in current playlist – 1 (21 total years) = 21 pts
Total Points – 39
Lineup 5
Paul, Gene, Eric Carr and Bruce Kulick
1984-1991 = 7 pts
Studio albums – 3 = 15 pts
Live Albums – 0 = 0 pts
Shows Played – 462 = 46.2
Records Sold – 5.2 million. = 52 pts
Years with no tour/no album – 1 = -20 pts
Songs in current playlist – 1 (24 total years) = 24 pts
Total Points – 124.2
Lineup 6
Paul, Gene, Bruce Kulick and Eric Singer
1992-1996 = 4 pts
Studio albums – 2 = 10 pts
Live Albums – 2 = 6 pts
Shows Played – 79 = 7.9
Records Sold – 2.1 million. = 21 pts
Years with no tour/no album – 0 = 0 pts
Songs in current playlist – 0 = 0 pts
Total Points – 48.9
Lineup 7
Paul, Gene, Eric Singer and Tommy Thayer
2003 - Current = 11 pts
Studio albums – 2 = 10 pts
Live Albums – 0 = 0 pts
Shows Played – 360 = 36 pts
Records Sold –500,000 = 5 pts
Years with no tour/no album – 3 = -60 pts
Songs in current playlist – 3 (9 total years) = 9 pts
Total Points – 11 pts
*Album sales courtesy of GreasyLake.org
I first became familiar with Don Jamieson from VH1’s That
Metal Show. For those who don’t know,
he, along with fellow comedian Jim Florentine and radio show host Eddie Trunk, is one of the hosts. I must confess to
be a tad addicted to this show. Even
though they’ve never addressed one of my complaints about the show (Stop
staging Stump the Trunk questions around the shows guests for one) I never miss
an episode. So when I heard Don Jamieson
was coming to MN, as a fan, I knew I had to go.
I used it as an excuse to take my wife out but the reality is if someone
told me he was at Como Park playing Frisbee with his dog I would’ve gone and
watched that. 
